Oh, the mighty Heisman! My, oh my, the voting results will be revealed on Saturday night! I think I might SWOON!!!
Listen, the Heisman Trophy is an overblown, media-driven joke and has been for many years. The award currently goes to the most well-known offensive player on a top five team. Of course, being media-driven, that criteria has evolved over time. Going back to B.T. (Before Tebow) the award was reserved for the most well-known junior or senior on a top five team (hence senior QB Eric Crouch beat sophomore QB Rex Grossman in 2001). Before that it was the best offensive player on a team playing for the national title (with the one outstanding exception being in 1997 when Charles Woodson deservedly beat Peyton Manning for the award – but we’ll get back to Woodson).
Don’t get me wrong, from its inception, the Heisman Trophy has made some absolutely AWFUL decisions such as Gary Beban over O.J. Simpson in 1967 and George Rogers over Hugh Green in 1980. But a solid case can be made for the vast majority of the winners up until the dreaded race of 1992. Before that year, players like Barry Sanders and Andre Ware and Bo Jackson could win the award despite not playing for a national title because they were still clearly the most outstanding player in college football.
But in 1992, a senior QB for the Miami Hurricanes named Gino Torretta had a pretty good season and his team played for the national title (where they were destroyed by Alabama). However, a sophomore RB named Marshall Faulk – you might have heard of him – playing healthy in only 9 games, led the nation in rushing for the 2nd straight year with 1630 yards and tore up ranked opponents like the USC Trojans and BYU Cougars with highlight-filled runs. You could have taken any college football fan, showed them the highlight package that NBC put together for Marshall Faulk and Gino Torretta on the Heisman show that year and the statistics against ranked competition, and Marshall Faulk would have won the award in a landslide. But take the Heisman panel of voters and somehow Torretta won.
I remember being a senior in high school who followed college football very closely and knew who Marshall Faulk was, thinking, WHAT?! It was my first real sense of political impurity in college football (boy if that sense hasn’t been overdosed in the subsequent 17 years) and it took me aback. I thought there had been a miscount. It just wasn’t possible. The best running back in college football since Barry Sanders didn’t win the award for most outstanding player?
That dangerous precedent set the tone and while the effects weren’t immediate (Charlie Ward, Rashaan Salaam, Danny Wuerffel and Ricky Williams all deserved the award and won) they rippled down over time. After 1995 we saw Eddie George over Tommie Frazier which was certainly questionable. 2001 had the aforementioned Crouch over Grossman debacle and then the floodgates fell open in 2003 when Jason White the QB at Oklahoma, LAUGHABLY won over WR Larry Fitzgerald at Pittsburgh. Seriously, at the time, maybe 5% of true college football fans would have said that Jason White was a more outstanding player that year than Larry Fitzgerald.
Since then, Matt Leinart beat Adrian Peterson, Troy Smith won over Darren McFadden and then last year, Sam Bradford for Oklahoma won, while Michael Crabtree from Texas Tech didn’t even finish in the TOP 3!
There’s a method to this madness to be sure – it’s about the media and money. You see, ESPN currently owns the broadcast rights of the presentation. Those rights were worth $200 grand to CBS in 1977, so you can imagine what they are worth today. ESPN pays that money to the Heisman Trophy Trust. You can be DAMN sure that the most outstanding player is very likely going to be the most well-known player of the finalists. Higher ranked teams get more nationally televised games, and you’d have probably seen this player a WHOLE lot on ESPN/ABC so that when they win the award, the rebroadcasts of “great” games that winner played in will get higher ratings on ESPN Classic.
Now I wouldn’t argue for a minute that Mark Ingram and Toby Gerhardt haven’t had good seasons. Gerhardt deserves the award more so than Ingram in my mind, but reasonable people can argue that. But the plainly obvious answer to the question, who is the most outstanding player in college football this season is Ndamukong Suh, the defensive tackle from Nebraska.
Before I get into Suh’s credentials, let’s explain why he won’t win. He doesn’t meet the new Heisman criteria:
A) He’s not an offensive player
B) He wasn’t a national story until his supernatural performance against Texas in the Big 12 title game
C) Not enough of his games were on ABC or ESPN because Nebraska wasn’t highly ranked enough
Note that none of the above have anything to do with being the most outstanding player, but in reality only one defensive player has actually ever won the award. That was Charles Woodson in 1997 and he also played on offense and returned kicks, plus his team was undefeated and shared the national title, so he was able to pass the “well-known” test. Woodson deserved it and I thought the Trophy was returning to integrity when he won, but alas no defensive player was won since and in the current environment, where the media pressure is even greater and even more money is involved, I believe it will be nearly impossible to see it again.
After all, if Ndamukong Suh can’t win it this year, what does a defensive player have to do? Suh was quite literally unstoppable this season. I wrote on TechSuperFans after the Hokies beat Nebraska on a miracle play, that Suh was the best tackle at the collegiate level I’d seen in several years. In that game he had 8 tackles, 2 QB hurries and 4 pass deflections. I’m not going to go game-by-game through his statistics, but he singlehandedly beat Missouri. He nearly singlehandedly beat Texas.
Have you ever heard of a defensive TACKLE nearly singlehandedly winning games for his team? A guy who is getting double teamed on nearly every play has 82 tackles for the season????? How is that humanly possible? I don’t know but I guess it’s just as possible as him losing the Heisman Trophy because he doesn’t play offense on a top 5 team. Ndamukong Suh was the most outstanding player in college football this season and the awards that aren’t yet packed with politics and money have already said so (Suh has won the Nagurski, the Outland, the Lombardi and the Bednarik awards). When he doesn’t win the award on Saturday I will just chuckle again, and the good news is so will Suh. This young man will be laughing all the way to the bank because the only top 5 he has to care about is that he will be a guaranteed top 5 pick in the NFL draft in April and whoever wins the award will become a trivia answer for college football nerds like me.